|
KMID : 1001320160430040219
|
|
Social Welfare Policy
2016 Volume.43 No. 4 p.219 ~ p.253
|
|
|
The Effects of Implementation Factors of Policies Regarding the Evaluation of Facilities Related to Violence against Women on the Evaluation Receptiveness of the Evaluated: Focusing on Perceptions of Workers of Protection Facilities for the Victims of Dom
|
|
Kim Ock-Nyu
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The present study is the result of the survey carried out for 26 days from March 16, 2015 on the workers of 80 protection facilities among 126 protection facilities for victims of domestic violence, sexual violence and prostitution that had undergone the 4th evaluation of facilities related to violence against women in 2013. The objective of this study is to analyze the implementation factors of the facility evaluation that affect the perception of facility evaluation and the evaluation receptiveness, and propose viable alternatives. The analysis shows the following results: First, as for the evaluation receptiveness of the evaluated, the need for evaluation policies scored 3.40, the effect of evaluation on improvement of facilities scored 3.06, and the satisfaction of evaluation scored 2.93 out of 5 respectively. As for the perception of implementation factors of facility evaluation, utilization of evaluation reports scored 3.34, reliability and fidelity of evaluation results scored 3.41 and 3.14 respectively, reliability of the method of evaluation scored 3.48, appropriateness of communication between agency implementing evaluation and the facility evaluated scored 3.34, rationality of the evaluation procedure scored 3.29, appropriateness of the evaluation period scored 3.22, and professionalism of the evaluation staff scored 3.08. Appropriateness of evaluation organization (2.88), appropriateness of tools (2.99), and policy diffusibility of evaluation results (2.92) marked somewhat lower scores. Second, a hierarchical regression analysis of implementation factors of facility evaluation that affect the evaluation receptiveness of the evaluated shows that the influence on the evaluation receptiveness was in the order of instrumental usage from usage of evaluation, rationality of evaluation procedure, fidelity of evaluation results, and diffusibility. Rank, facility type, education, and career, which are control variables, were not found to have an effect on the evaluation receptiveness.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
policies on the evaluation of VAW-related facilities, implementation factors of facility evaluation, evaluation receptiveness of the evaluated
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|